Menu

RHA Filler vs Juvederm – Treatment Areas and Results

Medically Reviewed
Medically Reviewed by Dr. Aurora Kalmanson on
Written by Fillers Editorial Team, plastic surgery specialists.

RHA (Resilient Hyaluronic Acid) fillers and Juvederm are both popular dermal filler options for addressing signs of facial aging, but they have some key differences. RHA fillers are the newest hyaluronic acid fillers on the market, specifically designed to treat dynamic wrinkles that form with facial movements.

Juvederm, a more established brand, traditionally targets static wrinkles and volume loss. While both are effective for rejuvenation, RHA’s unique formulation allows it to adapt better to facial expressions, potentially providing more natural-looking results in areas of frequent movement. This article examines the formulations, treatment areas, longevity, and overall effectiveness of RHA fillers compared to Juvederm to help patients and practitioners understand which option may be most suitable for different aesthetic goals.

Comparing RHA Fillers and Juvederm Fillers

RHA and Juvederm fillers represent different approaches to facial rejuvenation, each with its own strengths. Understanding their unique properties helps in selecting the most appropriate treatment for individual needs.

Formulation and Technology

RHA’s Resilient Hyaluronic Acid: RHA fillers are made using a patented manufacturing process that creates longer chains of hyaluronic acid molecules with fewer chemical modifications. This results in a gel that closely mimics the natural hyaluronic acid found in the skin. The resilient nature of RHA allows it to stretch and recoil, adapting to facial movements without breaking down or looking unnatural. This formulation makes RHA particularly effective for treating dynamic wrinkles in areas of the face that experience frequent movement, such as around the mouth and eyes.

Juvederm’s Hyaluronic Acid: Juvederm fillers utilize a proprietary VYCROSS® technology, which combines different molecular weights of hyaluronic acid. This creates a smooth, cohesive gel that provides excellent lift and volume. The varied molecular weights allow for targeted treatment of different skin layers and concerns. Juvederm’s formulation excels in creating structure and volume, making it ideal for addressing static wrinkles and restoring lost facial volume in areas like the cheeks and lips. The smooth consistency of Juvederm allows for easy injection and natural-looking results in areas that require significant volumization.

Indications and Treatment Areas

RHA for Dynamic Wrinkles: RHA fillers are specifically FDA-approved for treating dynamic facial wrinkles and folds. They are particularly effective for addressing nasolabial folds, marionette lines, and other areas around the mouth that move frequently during facial expressions. The RHA collection includes different formulations (RHA 2, RHA 3, and RHA 4) designed to target varying depths and severities of wrinkles. RHA’s ability to integrate seamlessly with facial movements makes it an excellent choice for patients who want to maintain natural expressiveness while reducing the appearance of lines and wrinkles.

Juvederm for Static Wrinkles: Juvederm excels in treating static wrinkles, which are visible even when the face is at rest. These fillers are particularly effective for addressing age-related volume loss and deep-set lines. Juvederm’s range of products targets different areas: Juvederm Ultra and Ultra Plus are ideal for moderate to severe facial wrinkles and folds, especially nasolabial folds. Juvederm Voluma is specifically designed to add volume to the cheek area, addressing mid-face volume loss. For lip enhancement and smoothing vertical lip lines, Juvederm Volbella provides subtle, natural-looking results. The smooth consistency of Juvederm allows for easy moldability, making it an excellent choice for precise contouring and volumization in areas that don’t experience as much movement.

Results and Longevity

RHA Fillers: Up to 15 Months: Resilient Hyaluronic Acid fillers are designed to provide longer-lasting results compared to traditional hyaluronic acid fillers. Clinical studies have shown that RHA fillers can maintain their effectiveness for up to 15 months in many patients. This extended duration is attributed to the unique manufacturing process that creates a more stable and resilient gel structure. The longevity of RHA fillers is particularly beneficial in dynamic areas of the face, where constant movement can typically break down other fillers more quickly. Patients may notice that the smoothing effect on wrinkles and folds persists even with regular facial movements and expressions, potentially reducing the frequency of touch-up treatments.

Juvederm Fillers: Up to 12 Months: Juvederm fillers typically offer results that last up to 12 months, although this can vary depending on the specific product and treatment area. Juvederm Voluma, used for cheek augmentation, can last up to 24 months in some cases, making it one of the longest-lasting hyaluronic acid fillers available. The longevity of Juvederm fillers is influenced by factors such as the individual’s metabolism, the area treated, and the amount of filler used. In areas with less movement, like the cheeks, Juvederm tends to maintain its results longer compared to more dynamic areas. Patients often appreciate the gradual, natural-looking fade of Juvederm fillers, which allows for subtle maintenance treatments to prolong the effects.

Side Effects and Risks

Potential for Reduced Swelling with RHA: One of the notable advantages of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid fillers is their potential for reduced post-treatment swelling. This is attributed to the purer, less modified hyaluronic acid used in RHA fillers, which more closely resembles the natural hyaluronic acid found in the skin. As a result, the body may have a milder inflammatory response to RHA injections compared to other fillers. Patients might experience less noticeable swelling and a quicker return to their normal appearance after treatment. This reduced swelling can be particularly beneficial for those who want to minimize downtime or for treatments in sensitive areas like the lips or under the eyes.

Similar Side Effect Profiles: Despite their formulation differences, Resilient Hyaluronic Acid fillers and Juvederm fillers share similar overall safety profiles. Common side effects for both include temporary redness, bruising, tenderness, and minor swelling at the injection sites. These effects typically resolve within a few days to a week. Both types of fillers carry a small risk of more serious complications such as infection, vascular occlusion, or allergic reactions, though these are rare when administered by experienced practitioners. The hyaluronic acid in both RHA and Juvederm fillers can be dissolved with hyaluronidase if necessary, providing an additional safety measure. Patients should always discuss potential risks and follow post-treatment care instructions carefully to minimize complications.

Combining RHA Fillers with Other Treatments

Integrating RHA fillers with other aesthetic treatments can enhance overall results. This section explores how RHA fillers can be used alongside neuromodulators and other dermal fillers for comprehensive facial rejuvenation.

RHA Fillers and Botox/Neuromodulators

Complementary Effects on Dynamic Wrinkles: Combining Resilient Hyaluronic Acid fillers with neuromodulators like Botox can provide enhanced results for treating dynamic wrinkles. While Resilient Hyaluronic Acid fillers add volume and support to the skin, neuromodulators work by relaxing the underlying muscles that cause wrinkles. This dual approach can be particularly effective for areas like the forehead, crow’s feet, and glabellar lines. The Resilient Hyaluronic Acid filler smooths out existing lines and restores volume, while the neuromodulator prevents the formation of new wrinkles by limiting muscle movement. This combination often results in a more youthful, relaxed appearance that looks natural both at rest and during facial expressions.

Timing and Sequence of Treatments: The timing and sequence of combining Resilient Hyaluronic Acid fillers with neuromodulators are crucial for optimal results. Typically, practitioners recommend administering the neuromodulator treatment first. This allows the muscles to relax and settle, usually taking about two weeks. After this period, the Resilient Hyaluronic Acid filler can be injected more precisely into the areas that still require volume or support. This sequence ensures that the filler is placed in the most effective position, as the relaxed muscles provide a more stable foundation. In some cases, both treatments may be administered in the same session, particularly for experienced patients familiar with their results. The practitioner will determine the best approach based on the individual’s facial anatomy and treatment goals.

RHA Fillers and Other Dermal Fillers

Addressing Multiple Concerns: Combining Resilient Hyaluronic Acid fillers with other types of dermal fillers allows practitioners to address a wide range of aesthetic concerns simultaneously. For instance, Resilient Hyaluronic Acid fillers might be used in areas prone to dynamic movement, such as around the mouth, while traditional hyaluronic acid fillers like Juvederm could be employed for deeper volumization in the cheeks or jawline. This multi-filler approach enables a comprehensive facial rejuvenation, tackling various signs of aging in different facial regions. By strategically selecting fillers based on their unique properties, practitioners can achieve a harmonious and natural-looking result that addresses volume loss, wrinkles, and facial contours in a single treatment plan.

Layering and Combining Fillers: The technique of layering and combining different fillers, including Resilient Hyaluronic Acid fillers, has become increasingly sophisticated in aesthetic medicine. Practitioners may use a layering technique, where different fillers are placed at various depths in the skin to achieve optimal results. For example, a firmer filler might be used as a deep support structure, while Resilient Hyaluronic Acid filler is layered on top for fine-tuning and movement adaptation. This approach allows for precise sculpting of facial features and can result in a more three-dimensional, natural-looking enhancement. The key to successful layering lies in understanding the unique properties of each filler and how they interact with different facial tissues, ensuring a seamless blend and avoiding overfilling or unnatural contours.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are RHA fillers better than Juvederm?

Whether RHA fillers are better than Juvederm depends on your specific needs. RHA fillers excel in treating dynamic wrinkles and can last up to 15 months, while Juvederm is effective for static wrinkles and volume loss, typically lasting up to 12 months.

How long do RHA fillers last compared to Juvederm?

RHA fillers can last up to 15 months, while Juvederm fillers generally last up to 12 months, although some specialized Juvederm products can last longer in specific areas.

Are RHA fillers more natural-looking than Juvederm?

RHA fillers are designed to adapt to facial movements, making them particularly natural-looking in dynamic areas of the face. Juvederm also provides natural results, especially in static areas needing volume or contouring.

Can you switch from Juvederm to RHA fillers?

Yes, you can switch from Juvederm to RHA fillers. Consult with a qualified practitioner to determine the best approach for transitioning and to ensure optimal results.

Are RHA fillers more expensive than Juvederm?

The cost of RHA fillers and Juvederm can vary based on the specific product and treatment area. Generally, pricing is comparable, but it ultimately depends on the practitioner's fee and geographical location.

Who is a good candidate for RHA fillers?

Good candidates for RHA fillers are individuals looking to treat dynamic wrinkles and folds, seeking longer-lasting, natural-looking results. Always consult with a qualified practitioner to determine if RHA fillers are right for you.

How do I choose between RHA and Juvederm fillers?

Choosing between RHA and Juvederm fillers depends on your specific concerns, such as whether you are treating dynamic or static wrinkles and your desired longevity of results. A consultation with a qualified practitioner will help you make an informed decision.

Conclusion

When choosing between RHA and Juvederm fillers, it is vital to consider your specific aesthetic goals, the type of wrinkles or volume loss you are addressing, and the desired duration of results. Both fillers offer unique advantages: RHA fillers are ideal for dynamic wrinkles and provide longer-lasting effects, while Juvederm excels in treating static wrinkles and adding volume to specific areas. A comprehensive consultation with a qualified practitioner is essential to develop a personalized treatment plan adapted to your individual needs, ensuring optimal and natural-looking results.

Was this article helpful?

Yes
No

References:

Kaufman-Janette, J., Joseph, J. H., Dayan, S. H., Smith, S., Eaton, L., & Maffert, P. (2022). Patient Comfort, Safety, and Effectiveness of Resilient Hyaluronic Acid Fillers Formulated With Different Local Anesthetics.

https://journals.lww.com/dermatologicsurgery/fulltext/2022/10000/patient_comfort,_safety,_and_effectiveness_of.10.aspx

Wongprasert, P., Dreiss, C. A., & Murray, G. (2022). Evaluating hyaluronic acid dermal fillers: A critique of current characterization methods.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dth.15453

Dr. Aurora Kalmanson

Always Consult a Medical Specialist

The information provided in this blog is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be interpreted as personalized medical advice. It's crucial to understand that while we are medical professionals, the insights and advice we provide are based on general research and studies. They are not tailored to individual health needs or conditions. Thus, it is essential to consult directly with a healthcare provider who can offer personalized medical advice relevant to your specific situation.